As silt gathers in Mirror Pond, officials unsure of who’s in charge of a solution

Three months after it was assembled, the management team tasked with finding a solution for the growing silt buildup problem in Bend’s Mirror Pond is still trying to decide who should take charge of the work — but some of the group’s members say they’re hoping to have the project leadership sorted out by early next year.

The Mirror Pond Management Board has more than a dozen members representing a variety of government agencies, environmental groups and businesses with interest in the situation. Sediment has been building up in the iconic pond since it was last dredged more than two decades ago, and water experts have said it will turn into mudflats and wetlands within the next five to 10 years if left untouched.

The last time Mirror Pond was dredged, in 1984, it cost $312,000 and the effort was led by the city of Bend. This time, the environmental regulations are stricter and the project is estimated to cost between $2 million and $5 million, and representatives for the agencies involved in the project say it’s simply too big of a price tag to take on alone — particularly given the current state of the economy.

“Everybody’s sort of in that position,” Bend City Manager Eric King said. “This is the time, when budgets are tight, that you sort of have to get a little more creative about not just about how you provide leadership, but how you implement projects.”

Shortly after the group started meeting in August, members began discussing which agency would lead the project and formed a subcommittee to consider the issue.

Bend City Councilor Tom Greene said some of the board expressed interest in letting the Bend Park & Recreation District take the lead because it owns more land around Mirror Pond than any other agency.

But Don Horton, the district’s executive director, said the project’s scope is too big to handle alone, in terms of both funding and planning.

“There was a discussion of whether or not we have to be the (lead) agency,” Horton said. “I think they see this as similar to a park project, but in our view it’s really not. We haven’t done projects to this scale that involve the environmental regulations this involves.”

Horton said the district wants to remain a key player in the work, so it has agreed take on a leadership role with the city of Bend and Pacific Power, which controls the dam that creates the pond.

Angela Jacobson, Pacific Power’s regional community manager, said the subcommittee members still need to take that idea back to the larger board in a meeting next month. She said it’s still unclear how much each agency will contribute to the initial planning process, which has been estimated to cost $500,000 and take up to two years.

But Jacobson said the board seems to agree that it should hire a manager to help coordinate the project in the near future.

“I think that could probably be the most efficient way, the most succinct way to move it along,” she said. “Otherwise, each of us as interested organizations represent our sole interests, and we may not necessarily come to any solutions.”

Source: The Bulletin ©2009

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *